If..Else Log

Storage, bandwidth and Dream hosts

It's human nature to want for more; we always look for the best deal, the best bang for buck whether it's shopping for food at the supermarket or using price comparison sites for checking out the cheapest fare or television. And as anyone who owns their own domain are probably quite net-savvy, webhosts are under pressure to competitively price themselves.

I've been with Dreamhost for quite a while now, who's front page pricing of $8 per month for a crazy 1TB of bandwidth and 20GB of storage is incredibly tempting especially when you look back just 5 years ago and compare what you were paying and getting then with now1. Of course, the announced specs should only play a tiny part in your decision making process2 but fortunately, I've been more than happy with DH.

Material needs

However, Podz is quite right in pointing out how little we actually use and need. We give to much weight to numbers and concerns about planning for unforeseen circumstances whereas we rarely even strain the packages that we pay for. So following his lead, here's what I actually use for this site.

  • 160mb used by the db
  • 200mb disk space used
  • 600mb of bandwidth per day or 18gb per month3

In other words, I use less than 0.01% of my allocated storage space and bandwidth. The problem is that, in the hosting market, there's substantial feature inflation brought on by the need for competitiveness. Because of the difficulties in comparing service, inordinate focus is placed on specs.

Unfortunately, there isn't really a better alternative.

But what can we do?

We can rely on word of mouth, though anecdotal evidence carries with it a whole load of flaws such as the limited/non-representational sample size, bias and imperfect correlation4. Review sites are even worse carrying with them an awful stench of corruption. How about sites that offer customer ratings? Sounds good until you consider that there's a lot of incentive for dodgy webhosts to add their 'noise' to the system.

Numbers are easy to understand and use. But the simplicity of figures mean that we have to be careful the dangers of giving unfair weight to them. We probably wouldn't buy a car simply because of it's top speed; we shouldn't make the same mistake with hosting.

Note that the links to DreamHost, my current webhosts, are referral links. As I'm a happy customer, I don't see any harm to having used such but I felt that in the context of this post, it's probably best to point that out in case you missed it.

  1. Particulary for us poor UK denizens. [back]
  2. Especially when you consider that, like airline companies, most webhosts including DH, also oversell. [back]
  3. Actually, this was more than I expected especially since there's no big downloads like movies or music on this site. [back]
  4. Not to mention that there is a serious conflict of interest with referral fees that are often offered by hosts. [back]

-30-

5 Responses to “Storage, bandwidth and Dream hosts”

  1. Gravatar Oliver

    Hmm, this is something that has been bugging me for a while. I just use my host for my ‘folio site and a few videos and photos for friends, and similarly i use only a fraction of my allowence. Imagine how much cheaper hosting would be if you only paid for what you used?

    Maybe pay-as-you go internet is the way forward?

  2. Gravatar Devlin Palmer

    There definitely is lots of space and features from Dreamhost, but there are a lot of downsides. They definitely aren’t very professional, and their administration panel is a major eyesore. At least they let you resell, and you gain more space and bandwidth each week, which outweighs the cons.:)

  3. Gravatar Phu

    “their administration panel is a major eyesore.”

    I quite like the control panel; it lacks visual polish but it’s fully functional and easy to use.

  4. Gravatar sesstreets

    Give me cpanel anyday. I knew that those sites don’t give real reviews. Its kinda simple to see. But still…3200 for the 10th place?

  5. Gravatar katy lavallee

    I use a pay-for-what-you-use host… the storage is cheap, but if I had 18 GB of data transfer every month, I’d have to switch to another host.